The Reluctant Security Guard

The case of the reluctant security guard has two sides to the story. -Do you obtain the security guard took the right sue? No. The rootage affaire that David should defecate done was put his complaint in authorship to make it official, most complaints that be verbal are illustrious but non official. David should work consulted with his coworkers and attempted concern as a group instead of one employees opinion. When a group of employees plow their concerns for policy changes that affect them, they will more likely be heard and the employer will address every(prenominal) their concerns. There is start in numbers rather than one person stressful to line a point across because David was dissatisfied with a policy change does not necessarily mean the rules of order will change their policy to meet Davids needs. David should have disconnected from Blue Mountain Company and went to work somewhere else. -Would you have taken the uniform action? Why or why not? I w ould not have taken the same action as David. I would have talked to my co-workers put all of our concerns on paper and had everyone sign their name. I would then approach management give them the document with all of the employees concerns and ask for a concourse with management and employees.

The employer was putting all their employees at seek of loosing their licenses by the new policy change. The employer was looking out for them as a stockholder and showed little respect for the stakeholders, which were the employees and the community. - Do you smack it was partial to fire the security guard? Why or wherefore not? The company has a set of guidelines for all its employees to fol low. David was not an exception to this rule! . David did receive a set of company... If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay