Was Napoleon a Liberator or a Conqueror?

Throughout cat sleeps rule many questions had risen excogitate about snoozes actions and his claim of mind. One of those was if whether sleep was a liberator or a conqueror. barelyice is that Napoleon was a conqueror. The only thing that Napoleon was cin one casentrate on was his main goal; to conqueror and dictation on the whole of Europe. That in which Napoleon had made himself make it that nonhing could invariably get in the way of him having complete and infinite power. Since Napoleon was much shorter than some others; he felt that he had to accomplish a lot to be placed preceding(prenominal) everyone else. Napoleon would always thence chose the other human face which had more than power than the other; not caring which side was his true, true opinion. As he once had mentioned: Since one must resume sides, one might as well choose the side that is victorious, the side which devastates loots and burns. This shows that Napoleon had no true devotion to author ities and never took notice of what was just or not; all he cared about was power. Upon comprehend this some may consider up the subject that Napoleon was indeed Pro-revolution; and he conquered lands so he could spread it to other countries as well.

The only agreement why Napoleon was in fact Pro-revolution was because his own unsophisticated favored it and he cognize that without the support of his people he had no chance of coming to power. Take for example the Napoleonic Code, Even thou half(prenominal) of the French revolution stood for woman eventually gaining equal rights; in the code Napoleon took outside(a) many of those new-fashioned rights away women. This just proves that Napoleon was in fact not pro-revolution! at all; instead he was much more into imperialism which is what troika him to conquer other lands. If you want to get a enough essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.